VoiceThread Implementation

Course B showed highest engagement where VoiceThread replaced synchronous tutorials and was required for assessment. Faculty actively encouraged participation, creating a snowball effect as students gained confidence. Course E had minimal participation without assessment requirements, highlighting the importance of extrinsic motivation.

Student feedback revealed barriers including discomfort with video responses, time requirements, and difficulty searching content. Positive aspects included conversational nature, hearing colleagues’ voices, and ability to convey tone.

VoiceThread versus Text-Based Forums

Course D comparison showed lower participation in VoiceThread (6-27%) versus previous text-based forums (10-45%). Students found VoiceThread time-consuming and difficult to scan for relevant content. However, a core group, particularly from rural/remote areas, actively participated and valued face-to-face interaction.

Video Enhancement

Course E’s chunked videos (<15 minutes) showed significantly higher completion rates:

• Full-length videos: 55-61% completion
• Chunked videos: 86-95% completion

Students responded positively to shorter format but interactive elements made little difference to engagement levels.

Engaging with Content and Connecting to Colleagues

Despite varying participation levels, students reported feeling engaged and connected. Consistently across courses, students referred to faculty by name and expressed feeling supported, despite many never meeting synchronously or in person. The human element of faculty presence emerged as crucial.