Is it reasonable to expect a state theatre company to program First Nations-centred work? If so, why? Is it reasonable to place the same level of expectation on smaller arts companies, like independent artists? As an artist about to emerge into the professional field, what expectations do you place on yourself in terms of intersecting with First Nations artists and audiences? Lewis apologised. Was the public apology enough? If you were working for the company, what would you advise as the correct course of action moving forward?
I believe that it should be expected that an Australian state theatre company have works that are First Nations-centred. While COVID was used as an excuse in this instance, this theatre company is still supposed to be represented the theatre needs of the state. However, when it comes to smaller art companies, my opinions change. I believe it would come down to what the art company represents, i.e., the context of how and what the art company does in making a judgment on the topic. With that being said, First Nations considerations should always be made. When it comes to myself, and the work that I currently produce, I consider at the very least, how the work is interpreted by First Nation individuals. However, with the work that I produce currently, that is as far as it goes. With the future intention to get into the media industry, these considerations must go further and First Nation individuals would need to be included into the process for a thoughtful creation and perspective.
On the topic of Lee Lewis’s apology, I believe the apology was almost enough. I would have recommended that, included alongside the apology, a plan, that has had First Nations consultation, is brought forth to show how the mistake will not be made again. I would also advocate for more transparency on how these programs are put together.
