Alderman’s Continuous Learning Framework as the theoretical underpinning of the Evaluation System:

The Evaluation System at UniSQ is grounded in Alderman’s Continuous Learning Framework, which provides the theoretical foundation for fostering a culture of continuous improvement and innovation in higher education. This framework recognizes that education is an ongoing process of growth and adaptation, and it emphasizes the importance of incorporating feedback and data-driven insights into the evaluation and enhancement of programs and courses. By embracing the Continuous Learning Framework, UniSQ acknowledges the need for regular assessment, reflection, and refinement to ensure that its educational offerings remain relevant, effective, and responsive to the evolving needs of students and society.

Alignment of the Framework with the design and iterative approach of the Evaluation System:

The design and iterative approach of the Evaluation System at UniSQ align seamlessly with Alderman’s Continuous Learning Framework. The system embraces an iterative cycle of evaluation, feedback, and improvement, enabling continuous enhancements to teaching and learning practices. This iterative approach allows for the regular collection and analysis of data, which then informs evidence-based decision-making and drives targeted interventions. By aligning with the Continuous Learning Framework, the Evaluation System promotes a dynamic and adaptive process of evaluation and improvement, ensuring that programs and courses evolve in line with emerging trends, pedagogical advancements, and the ever-changing needs of learners.

Inclusion of underrepresented stakeholders and the use of qualitative environmental analytic reports:

The Evaluation System at UniSQ is committed to inclusivity and recognizes the importance of engaging underrepresented stakeholders in the evaluation and enhancement processes. The system actively seeks input and perspectives from diverse stakeholders, including students, faculty, staff, industry partners, and community members, to ensure a comprehensive and holistic understanding of program and course quality. Additionally, qualitative environmental analytic reports play a crucial role in capturing the nuanced perspectives and experiences of stakeholders. These reports provide in-depth qualitative insights into the learning and teaching environment, offering valuable context and highlighting areas for improvement beyond quantitative metrics. By incorporating the voices of underrepresented stakeholders and utilizing qualitative environmental analytic reports, UniSQ ensures that the Evaluation System is inclusive, responsive, and attuned to the diverse needs and experiences of its stakeholders.